Extra! Extra! Flintstones Movie Got Something Right!
Well, not really. But remember how (unlike the ancient cartoon) they decided to make some kind of statement about evolution by having the cave-men live side-by-side with apes? Well some scientists now believe there is evidence that a million years ago (give or take), early hominids, having evolved and diverged from a common ancestor, took a little dip in the gene-pool, interbreeding for a while with chimpanzees before separating again for good. I'm not sure whether this helps to explain our 96% genetic similarity to chimps, or whether that was part of the evidence they used to conclude this. But it just goes to remind us all: the live-action Flintstones really did suck.
And speaking of sub-humans and instances of civilizational regression, Stephen Harper's conservative govenment is still playing political games in Canada. I wish that more people would watch Question Period in the House of Commons... I mean, yes, the questions are all political maneuvering, and a lot of the time they are trying to make a big thing of little innocent slipups or gain political mileage from scandals that are in reality dealt with and done. But the real point of televising it (or what WOULD be the point if anybody watched other than pundits, columnists, senior citizens and
me) is that you when they ask somebody a question, you can usually tell very rapidly if the person responding is (A) totally dodging and/or politicizing the isse, or is (B) totally freaking clueless, or (C) all of the above.
For example: Canada's current Minister of the Environment (in a purely Orwellian sense, I can assure you), Rona Ambrose, works for an administration that wants to blow off the Kyoto accord, which is sort of the environmental equivalent of how North Korea (and now Iran) have treated the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty. Since the government's reasoning on this is specious (I won't get into it right now), every time she is asked a question about it she responds with the equally specious statement that [to paraphrase]
"In order to meet those targets we would have to take every plane, train and automobile in Canada off the roads".
That's like somebody who smokes and drinks a lot saying "
I can't afford to fix my roof; I'd have to stop buying food!", which of course ignores the fact that while food is essential (no compromising there), he could save just as much if he cut down on his drinking and stopped, I dunno, SMOKING?
( Read more... ) Current Mood:
angry